Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Nick Ing-Simmons
Date:
July 26, 2000 07:25
Subject:
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Message ID:
200007261423.PAA06993@gabrielle.tiuk.ti.com
Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
>Adam Turoff <ziggy@panix.com> writes:
>
>> Perforce has no native network security model. Security is handled
>> through ssh and other such tricks.
>
>CVS shares this drawback. You don't ever want to use pserver for anything
>other than anonymous access to the repository; for any commit access, you
>want to handle the security with ssh or some other similar system.
But the ssh issue is exactly what has caused the perception that perl5
perforce depot is "closed" - getting one's ssh key registered was not
as easy as it could/should have been.
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next