develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Perforce vs CVS

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Nick Ing-Simmons
Date:
July 26, 2000 07:25
Subject:
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Message ID:
200007261423.PAA06993@gabrielle.tiuk.ti.com
Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
>Adam Turoff <ziggy@panix.com> writes:
>
>> 	Perforce has no native network security model.  Security is handled
>> 	through ssh and other such tricks.
>
>CVS shares this drawback.  You don't ever want to use pserver for anything
>other than anonymous access to the repository; for any commit access, you
>want to handle the security with ssh or some other similar system.

But the ssh issue is exactly what has caused the perception that perl5
perforce depot is "closed" - getting one's ssh key registered was not 
as easy as it could/should have been.


-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About