develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Perforce vs CVS

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Nick Ing-Simmons
July 26, 2000 07:20
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Message ID:
Russ Allbery <> writes:
>Er... CVS has done branching and three-way merging since the beginning of
>CVS; that was one of the whole original points behind CVS.  So I guess I'm
>missing the thrust of this point of Perforce.  I've been curious for a bit
>what makes Perforce so much better too, so I'd love to hear more.
>Is it just that three-way merges are easier/better?  How so?

The three way merges are a tad worse than GNU three-way merge.

Perforce's strengths are SPEED and ease of setup.

Nick Ing-Simmons

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About