develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Perforce vs CVS

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Tom Hughes
Date:
July 26, 2000 00:35
Subject:
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Message ID:
5a8608e449.tom@compton.compton.nu
In message <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007252131420.27060-100000@impatience.valueclick.com>
          Ask Bjoern Hansen <ask@valueclick.com> wrote:

> in my experience branching doesn't work in real life in CVS. They
> say it is much easier and works much better in perforce. At
> ValueClick we're moving from CVS to perforce for that specific
> reason (well, mostly).

I use CVS every day at work and we have dozens if not hundreds
of branches and merge them as necessary without any problems.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
...If your bread is stale, make toast.


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About