develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Perforce vs CVS

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Ask Bjoern Hansen
Date:
July 25, 2000 21:34
Subject:
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Message ID:
Pine.LNX.4.21.0007252131420.27060-100000@impatience.valueclick.com

in my experience branching doesn't work in real life in CVS. They
say it is much easier and works much better in perforce. At
ValueClick we're moving from CVS to perforce for that specific
reason (well, mostly).

that being said: that I faxed perforce to get the license doesn't
mean we have to use it so if we decide on CVS (which I am much more
familiar with running) I'll just set that up instead.


 - ask

-- 
ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>




Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About