develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Perforce vs CVS

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
July 25, 2000 21:30
Subject:
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Message ID:
20000726133025.A3518@justanother.perlhacker.org
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:11:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Er... CVS has done branching and three-way merging since the beginning of
> CVS; that was one of the whole original points behind CVS.  So I guess I'm
> missing the thrust of this point of Perforce.  I've been curious for a bit
> what makes Perforce so much better too, so I'd love to hear more.
> 
> Is it just that three-way merges are easier/better?  How so?

http://www.perforce.com/perforce/cvs.html is obviously biased, but reasonably
accurate.

-- 
Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About