develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Perforce vs CVS

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Simon Cozens
July 25, 2000 21:30
Re: Perforce vs CVS
Message ID:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:11:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Er... CVS has done branching and three-way merging since the beginning of
> CVS; that was one of the whole original points behind CVS.  So I guess I'm
> missing the thrust of this point of Perforce.  I've been curious for a bit
> what makes Perforce so much better too, so I'd love to hear more.
> Is it just that three-way merges are easier/better?  How so? is obviously biased, but reasonably

Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About