Joshua N Pritikin <joshua.pritikin@db.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:52:27AM -0700, brockw@k2.llnl.gov wrote: > > But anyway, the point is that maybe we should consider outputting more > > than just one backend language... this would really increase portability, > > and if there are two maintained ones then it will make others much easier > > to add, if one so desired. Of course the downfall would be more work on > > our part. > > For what it's worth, I think it would be cool to support guile. 1. using (explicit) refcounts or mark-and-sweep all-the-way-baby? 2. Why?? -- John Tobey, late nite hacker <jtobey@john-edwin-tobey.org> \\\ /// ]]] With enough bugs, all eyes are shallow. [[[ /// \\\