At 14:42 +0100 2000.07.25, Hugo wrote: >people realising it before it is too late. I think this is one thing >that the voting may have been intended to address - "hey folks, this >may be the _last_ chance to make your views known" - but I think it >is probably not the best way. If the RFC approach is done right, I >think it can solve this problem: for that, I think a) there needs to >be a way to say 'notify me when the RFC text changes', and b) the text >of the RFC needs to be updated (among other occasions) when consensus >starts to emerge but before any final decision is taken. Excellent ideas. That way people don't have to monitor mailing lists just so they can keep an eye out for when something that they know interests them is going to come along. -- Chris Nandor | pudge@pobox.com | http://pudge.net/ Andover.Net | chris.nandor@andover.net | http://slashcode.com/Thread Previous | Thread Next