develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Working Group Proposal

Joshua N Pritikin
July 25, 2000 05:12
Re: Working Group Proposal
Message ID:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 06:55:46PM -0700, wrote:
> According to horos:
> > Include keyword 'open' in perl library? [y]
> > 	Include support for 'http' in 'open' [y]
> > 	Include support for 'ftp' in 'open' [y]
> > 	Overload 'open' with other support (https, etc)? [n];
> > 
> > Include keyword 'close' in perl library? [y]
> > Include keyword 'select' in perl library? [y] n 
> One point against: The more of Perl that's optional, the more Perl
> programs become non-portable -- perhaps by accident.

Counterpoint: in the last few project that I done, I've built a custom
version of perl specifically for the project.  I don't care about
running every script imaginable on this perl install.  I only care about
the perl related to the project.  I think this model of development is
going to become more common.  I envision at least two perl branchings:

generic perl -- a unix utility for sysadmins, random scripts

applcation specific perl -- a custom built version for a specific project

Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.
                       (via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank) Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About