On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > According to Dan Sugalski: > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Simon Cozens wrote: > > > Fair enough, but I'm talking about LGPLed libraries which are not viral. > > [...] > > 2) Need to snag the code and beat it into submission ourselves. > > #2 has licensing issues. > > I don't think so. Once LGPL'd, always LGPL'd. Right. Which precludes us from snagging it. Using the library, sure, but not grabbing and modifying the code. Though I suppose we could ship a modified libwhatever with perl, but that still doesn't feel right. (Regardless of whether it's legit, which is a separate question) DanThread Previous | Thread Next