develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: y/rple/yma/ (was: LALR (was Re: Working Group Proposal))

From:
Nick Ing-Simmons
Date:
July 24, 2000 19:44
Subject:
Re: y/rple/yma/ (was: LALR (was Re: Working Group Proposal))
Message ID:
E13GuYW-0001Dn-00@roam1
<abigail@foad.org> writes:
>> 
>> 	$foo.method();
>> 
>> same as
>> 
>> 	$foo->method();
>
>
>Urg. Those are things I can't see the benefits of. It doesn't make
>the syntax any less complicated. It just creates another "there is
>more than one way to do it". But with the only benefit a keystroke.
>It just adds to the perceived problem of Perl being hard.

One reason for use of '.' is mapping Win32's COM names in a way that 
makes sense to the would-be users. 
The _documented_ interfaces use a . notation 

As such the '.' might only have this meaning if left operand was 
an object... but we are getting into details again.

-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About