Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
Re: LALR
From:
Chip Salzenberg
Date:
July 24, 2000 19:07
Subject:
Re: LALR
Message ID:
20000724190717.E488@perlsupport.com
According to Tom Christiansen:
> Which particular parts of "Perl's syntax" are you suggesting be
> stricken, and why? What's the cost and the benefit to doing so?
I could answer you with the detailed complaints I sent to Horos, but I
can't do that without duplicating a lot of traffic that will be carried
here in the near future anyway.
So I request that you wait until the collected rant list is published,
at which time your typically long and detailed rebuttals will be
welcome and appropriate. No sarcasm.
Until then, please just take everyone's complaints as WIBNIs
("Wouldn't it be nice if....") and relax. Nothing will change
overnight. And Larry's in charge of the language design, anyway.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@valinux.com>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Moore, Paul
-
Working Group Proposal
by Kurt D. Starsinic
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things
by Moore, Paul
-
Re: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Gr oup Proposal)
by simon
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Moore, Paul
-
Re: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Benjamin Stuhl
-
Re: implementation strategy (was Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Benjamin Stuhl