develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: group lists

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Ask Bjoern Hansen
Date:
July 24, 2000 18:45
Subject:
Re: group lists
Message ID:
Pine.LNX.4.21.0007241840500.5526-100000@impatience.valueclick.com
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Uri Guttman wrote:

[...]
> now we have the old reply-to set to list or not war. if you are on a
> list, i say reply-to should go to the list. it is the more common
> operation. but as with all holy wars the infidels disagree. even here,

and it doesn't matter as long as I'm maintaining the list software.

read: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

besides running qmail/ezmlm that's probably the only thing I'm not
going to bend on.

> i am sometimes getting useless multiple copies if i get cc'ed
> and the list message as well.

I find having this:

:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 16384 .msgid.cache

in my .procmailrc very useful.


 - ask

-- 
ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About