On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 05:40:46PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > >so can we focus on the groups already? not features or implementations >but the top level groups which will own the specs (and later >implementation) for the major subsections of perl6. my post before and >jarrko's followup are a first step. i think between those 2 we have a >good first pass at the groups. do we have rfpc format for that yet? Don't get the cart before the horse. There is no overall agreement on what needs addressing, yet. It strikes me, just looking at Uri's preliminary list, that there is some crossover between "syntax" and "cleanup", and between "data structures" and "objects". "execution", "microperl", and "bytecode" also seem to be connected. Let's bash out this list first, and figure out what people think needs to be done. Then we can either discuss, vote, or defer to Larry on what actually should be done. Only then should people start putting their hands up to work on specific things and form working groups. K. -- Kirrily Robert -- <skud@netizen.com.au> -- http://netizen.com.au/ Open Source development, consulting and solutions Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000 Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948 Mobile: +61 410 664 994Thread Previous | Thread Next