develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Working Group Proposal

From:
Joshua N Pritikin
Date:
July 20, 2000 09:51
Subject:
Re: Working Group Proposal
Message ID:
20000720125120.T17718@ghostwheel.wks.na.deuba.com
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:41:54PM +0000, sho_pi@hotmail.com wrote:
> I like this idea. However, as performance is still somewhat of an issue (and  
> perl5, at least, eats immense amounts of memory even in C),

If perl6 is written in perl5, why can't we make memory/speed tradeoffs
explicit?  For example, why couldn't we shuffle bits in and out of
SvTYPE?  To me, it's all about capturing the logical relationships which
are implied indirectly by the present perl5 source code.

-- 
May the best description of competition prevail.
      (via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About