Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Graham Barr wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 08:49:14PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > He's also said that it's likely that dots will be allowed for indirect > > object notation: > > > > $foo.method(); > > > > same as > > > > $foo->method(); > > That is actually one suggestion I dislike. People refered to this as aligning > with other languages. But if you consider references like C/C++ pointers then > we are already aligned with them. > > Graham. And what about concating strings? What happens to the overloaded . then?Thread Previous | Thread Next