develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

LALR (was Re: Working Group Proposal)

From:
Joshua N Pritikin
Date:
July 24, 2000 09:43
Subject:
LALR (was Re: Working Group Proposal)
Message ID:
20000724124309.A3716@ghostwheel.wks.na.deuba.com
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:34:19PM -0400, jdporter@min.net wrote:
> horos wrote:
> > LALR would be awesome, I would even say essential. It strikes at the heart of 
> > the complaint people have of perl being a 'messy' language, puts it on the the 
> > same playing field as Java and Python.
> 
> That would tantamount to Perl (aka Larry, aka the Perl community) saying, 
> "We were wrong, Java and Python were right."  But we weren't wrong.

Why can't perl ultimately support multiple syntax conventions?  Why
can't the lexer/parser be pluggable?

-- 
May the best description of competition prevail.
      (via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About