On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 03:20:34PM +0000, Simon Cozens wrote: > Benjamin Stuhl (lists.bootstrap): > >>And, more importantly, why? > > > >One word: GPL > > LPGL, actually. > > But we're going to throw away all the good development out there > for *POLITICAL* reasons? Are you truly barking mad? It seems sane to me to avoid _one_ well-implemented library based on policy. But as soon as one morphs the word `policy' into the word `political', it sounds like it's all about fluff like image and popularity, instead of important issues like _who can use the software under what terms_ . . . . Peace, * Kurt Starsinic (kstar@orientation.com) ---------- Senior Network Engineer * | `The future masters of technology will have to be lighthearted and | | intelligent. The machine easily masters the grim and the dumb.' | | -- Marshall McLuhan |