Front page | perl.beginners |
Postings from August 2009
Re: Perl "expert"
August 19, 2009 08:29
Re: Perl "expert"
Message ID: email@example.com
>>>>> "Raymond" == Raymond Wan <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Raymond> Of course, blind leading the blind is a bad thing. But the intention
Raymond> was good and the admission of not being an expert was offered at the
Raymond> same time. Maybe all I'm saying is "admonish, but admonish with
Raymond> restraint"; the person being admonish could be the next expert some
Raymond> day...if given the chance... ;-)
Unfortunately, there is voluminous evidence my level of admonishment has
nearly nothing to do with the person I'm correcting, and a lot more to do with
my mood of the day.
I do escalate pretty quickly. If someone gets one thing wrong, I'll be curt,
and say "that doesn't work, please test before you post". If I notice they do
it a second time, I'll generally escalate to "you're hurting more than you're
helping. test before you post." And after a third time, I bring out the
Luckily, that's pretty rare, but there *does* seem to be a class of people who
think they know more than they do, consistently. And when one of those
wanders into a help gathering, it can be a real pile of work for those of us
who *actually* know.
And I'm with Uri here... I definitely do *not* answer anything that I haven't
had experience with, unless I preface my answer with "I think..." so that
Smarter People(tm) can check my work. If only everyone followed that rule,
life would be simpler. :)
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion