develooper Front page | perl.beginners | Postings from April 2002

Re: FW: Time arithmetics...

Thread Previous
From:
drieux
Date:
April 2, 2002 16:50
Subject:
Re: FW: Time arithmetics...
Message ID:
BFBBC6B6-469C-11D6-8B1B-0030654D3CAE@wetware.com

On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 04:09 , Jonathan E. Paton wrote:

> I think we should petition our OS designers to think
> ahead.  The short-sightedness of programmers caused
> the Y2K issue, we should avoid repeating our mistakes.

like dude, relax.

according to Moore's law the last CPU upgrade
occurs in 2017 - after which they can start
fixing the other kernel bugs without having
to worry about CPU upgrades coming along.

The next one is like 2034 or so when those folks
using 32-bit architecturs eat it for time_t structs.

Then there's the 10K bug where they have to like
dig up all the like really old geezers who like patched
for the y2K bug by like shifting to a four character
representation...

So Like One Problem at a Time.....

I mean, like the Fascists in the CGI.pm Kabal upgraded
to playing in XHTML basic - but did give us a pragma
to -no_xhtml but they like didn't give us a pragma for

	-parse_that_MicroSmurfLikeLayoutStuff

so Like you have to build Wako HTML::TreeBuilder::WhatFromMicroWhom
extensions so that you can get to the data you need in the
bot, and they are like a whole lot closer.....

so I mean like we have to like have like priorities .....

chill....

ciao
drieux

---

maybe I shouldn't have switched to decaf...

I Mean, like that new standard to shift all tcp/ip
packets to an XML format is like, wow.... the colours....




Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About