develooper Front page | perl.beginners | Postings from March 2002

&function() or function()? and etiquette...

Thread Next
From:
Nikola Janceski
Date:
March 21, 2002 07:26
Subject:
&function() or function()? and etiquette...
Message ID:
1449413DA482D311B67000508B5A12F50592DF11@nyexchange01.summithq.com
This question is more for the gurus. It's about etiquette and style. I
realize now the benefits of following coding standards and etiquette, and of
course use warnings and use strict.

My question lies in the & when calling a subroutine. Should those who are
starting out use &function(); or function(); ??

I am also seeing the benefits of using prototypes when declaring my
functions. No more worries of having to put the \ on the correct arguments
when calling my wacky functions that take 2 refs and 3 scalars. Are
prototypes recommended for easy maintenance? Or do they just get in the way
and confuse others? Oh and how do you declare a subroutine with a prototype
for NO arguments?

Nikola Janceski

The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution,
which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skills. To
raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new
angle requires creative imagination and marks real advances in science.
-- Albert Einstein (1879-1955) 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
The views and opinions expressed in this email message are the sender's
own, and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Summit
Systems Inc.


Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About