Re: Fedora 11 breaks Wx 0.91

Johan Vromans wrote:
> Mattia Barbon <mattia.barbon@libero.it> writes:
> 
>> Maybe the Perl RPM was built with -DPERL_USE_SAFE_PUTENV but the
>> flag was not passed to wxPerl?
> 
> Exactly.
> 
>> I think it ia an issue with the way the RPM was built and not with
>> wxPerl.
> 
> Maybe. But manually keeping build options in sync is asking for
> problems. Shouldn't the wxPerl Makefile.PL infer the perl build
> options using Config.pm instead?

   I think the build option should be reported in Perl's config.h;
and I think it's the job of the build toolchain to correctly pass
build options from Perl to extensions.

Regards,
Mattia

• The wxPerl stack and how to declare minimum version of wxWidgets? by Gabor Szabo
• Fedora 11 breaks Wx 0.91 by Johan Vromans
• Re: Fedora 11 breaks Wx 0.91 by Mattia Barbon
• Re: Fedora 11 breaks Wx 0.91 by Johan Vromans
• Re: Fedora 11 breaks Wx 0.91 by Mattia Barbon
• Re: The wxPerl stack and how to declare minimum version of wxWidgets? by Mattia Barbon