Front page | perl.sdk |
Postings from March 2002
From: Stas Bekman
March 8, 2002 07:43
Message ID: 3C88DC14.firstname.lastname@example.org
Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:35:09AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>>Since the module involves the CPAN concept of Bundle you should capitalise
>>>on that and incorporate it in the name...maybe CPAN::SuperBundle or
>>>CPAN::BundleBuilder or CPAN::BundleGrabber or .... Bundle should be in the
>>>The SDK* would likely be something of a misnomer as it's not really a
>>>'development kit' hmm..what about a CBK , A CPAN Bundle Kit?
>>Another name I've suggested was CPAN::DistroMaker. mnemonic: linux
>>distros bundle a bunch of apps with some glueing code to make a distro.
>>So currently I'm thinking to choose from:
> I'd prefer a word rather than a new acronym like CBK.
> And I think 'Bundle' is mostly associated with the very lightweight
> Bundle::Foo specification files. So, s we're talking about something
> actually embeds other distributions, I'd prefer Distro over Bundle.
> I think I'd lean more towards Builder (as in fetch and consolidate)
> more than Maker , since I'd associate make more with the final
> "perl Makefile.PL && make" process, which this isn't involved in.
> So CPAN::BundleBuilder. Umm, sounds kind'a snappy.
Tim, I thought you said you prefer Distro over Bundle :)
then it must be CPAN::DistoBuilder, no?
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:email@example.com http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/