Front page | perl.sdk |
Postings from September 2001
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 06:57:41AM -0700, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote: > I have retracted the VERSION patch for the moment for two reasons: Perl > versions are real numbers, and your patch treats them like canonical > version strings. This might cause a problem in future, eg when we go from > 0.3 to 0.11; in perl 0.3 > 0.11. i see. that's quite reasonable. :) but how about sprintf()'ing so it reads 0.003 => 0.011, or just using the v0.3.11 notation? > Also, CVS insists on starting revision numbers with 1.x. I am sure there's > a way to force it to use 0.x, I just haven't figured it out yet. i'm using perforce, and have no idea about cvs. :) > A question for those reading the SDK list and module@perl.org: should I > upload sidekick to CPAN? as the sidekick script utilizes plenty of CPAN.pm function, how about abstract it to a module named CPAN::SDK, and work toward an integration with Bundle / MakeMaker so i could 'make sdk' or query SDKs from cpan> prompt? just my two cents, /Autrijus/Thread Previous | Thread Next