Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects?

On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:

> The stop energy
> he is throwing at it has no substantive reason so far, only “I don’t
> care for this”.

No, no, no, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to make it sound like "You shouldn't do this module."  No stop energy intended. I just wanted to provide a counter viewpoint from a potential customer.

I don't want to have another module prereq.  I'd probably just do the cut & paste into my t/00-load.t. 

Carry on!

xoa

--
Andy Lester => andy@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

• Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Paul Johnson
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Mike Doherty
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Mike Doherty
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by chromatic
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by The Sidhekin
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ruud H.G. van Tol
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by James E Keenan
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael Peters
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael Peters
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: 00-load.t tool by Eric Wilhelm
• Re: 00-load.t tool by Buddy Burden
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Smylers
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Eirik Berg Hanssen
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis