Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects?

> -- 
> ROCKS FALL! EVERYONE DIES!
> 	http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp05032002.shtml
> 


I think we've found our correct non-loading module behavior right there.

xoa

--
Andy Lester => andy@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

• Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Paul Johnson
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Mike Doherty
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Mike Doherty
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by chromatic
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by The Sidhekin
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ruud H.G. van Tol
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by James E Keenan
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael Peters
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael Peters
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Andy Lester
• Re: 00-load.t tool by Eric Wilhelm
• Re: 00-load.t tool by Buddy Burden
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Smylers
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Eirik Berg Hanssen
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Ovid
• Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects? by Aristotle Pagaltzis