develooper Front page | perl.qa | Postings from November 2011

Re: Relying more on Mouse

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Michael Ludwig
Date:
November 26, 2011 11:34
Subject:
Re: Relying more on Mouse
Message ID:
20111126193408.GM4556@Dago
Gabor Szabo schrieb am 26.11.2011 um 10:44 (+0200):
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Ovid <curtis_ovid_poe@yahoo.com>
> wrote:

> > Rename TB2::Mouse to something like
> > TB2::_U_R_A_MORON_FOR_USING_THIS_ and I
> > think the problem will take care of itself.

> I can just imagine what people outside of the Perl community
> will say when they see such code in the official distribution
> of Perl.

Which is why TB2::Mole or TB2::Vole are better solutions.

I don't understand the concern for unauthorised use. How would
it be different from relying on any other implementation detail?
In spirit, it's like relying on internal JDK classes.

TB2::Mouse/Hamster/Mole/Vole does not mean Mouse is core.

Just my two end user cents.
-- 
Michael Ludwig
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About