develooper Front page | perl.qa | Postings from October 2011

Re: Do we need subtests in TAP?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Adrian Howard
Date:
October 29, 2011 01:52
Subject:
Re: Do we need subtests in TAP?
Message ID:
DBC1E179-1066-4AD1-A095-D81C7E33D519@quietstars.com
Hey,

On 29 Oct 2011, at 09:18, Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Do you find *blocks with their own name and plan* convenient, or subtests
> which have their own separate test state (as currently implemented)

This may be me being dim - but I'm not really groking the distinction you're making. Could you give an example of the kind of difference that you're proposing?

Cheers,

Adrian
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About