Front page | perl.qa |
Postings from July 2011
David, Thanks for your suggestion. Earlier, I had a different level of abstraction where I create all the test scenarios .t files during runtime with the two lines and executed them using runtests. After that I deleted the individual .t files. Its just for the breakdown of the test names with number of passed/failed results. Regards, Murugesan -----Original Message----- From: david@autopragmatic.com [mailto:david@autopragmatic.com] On Behalf Of David Golden Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 4:38 PM To: Murugesan Kandasamy Cc: perl-qa@perl.org Subject: Re: Suggestion regarding test suite design On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Murugesan Kandasamy <KMurugesan@ventechsolutions.com> wrote: > I have hundreds of similar scenarios and they are getting executed well and working as expected with test harness. But my doubt is I am having hundreds of .t files just with two lines of code i.e. loading the module, calling the subroutine Load_and_execute with the xml file as input. Is it not just a repetition/code duplication? But I need a way to test the whole suite with multiple scenarios like this. Is any other way possible. Maybe you need another level of abstraction. Create a file that contains all your cases (what you would put in the two-line .t file) and then have one .t file iterate through that file, calling each case. -- DavidThread Previous