Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness

On Thursday 19 February 2009 04:05:37 Ovid wrote:

> Properly, if we want to report SKIPs for each test (presumably with
> numbers), then we want to report failing TODOs with each test for
> consistency's sake.

I don't like that.  You can already get this behavior with the --directives 
flag from prove, and it subverts the point of the TODO directive: run the 
test, but expect it to fail and don't make a big deal of it.

If you report failing TODOs (sorry, *passing* TODOs), you might as well report 
passing oks.

-- c

• Test skip()'ing weirdness by Pedro Figueiredo
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by Pedro Figueiredo
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by Ovid
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by Ovid
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by chromatic
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by Pedro Figueiredo
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by Michael G Schwern
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by Ovid
• Re: Test skip()'ing weirdness by chromatic