Front page | perl.qa |
Postings from February 2009
Hi,
I've had a report from a user regarding some tests under Darwin (10.5.6,
Leopard, I have no idea if it happens on earlier versions too). I've
since noticed the behaviour under 5.10 on Linux is not what I expected
either.
This is the test code:
#!perl -T
use strict;
use Test::More tests => 1;
SKIP: {
skip( "meh", 1 );
ok( 1, "dud" );
}
Darwin (10.5.6, Leopard)
perl 5.8.8:
$ prove foo.t
foo....ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.02 cusr
0.00 csys = 0.04 CPU)
Result: PASS
$ /usr/bin/perl -MTest::More -le 'print $Test::More::VERSION'
0.86
perl 5.10.0:
$ prove foo.t
foo....ok
1/1 skipped: various reasons
All tests successful, 1 subtest skipped.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU)
$ /usr/local/bin/perl -MTest::More -le 'print $Test::More::VERSION'
0.86
Still not what I expected, but better than 5.8.8.
Linux (Ubuntu Server 8.04)
perl 5.8.8:
$ prove foo.t
foo....ok
1/1 skipped: meh
All tests successful, 1 subtest skipped.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.05 CPU)
$ /usr/bin/perl -MTest::More -le 'print $Test::More::VERSION'
0.62
perl 5.10.0:
$ prove foo.t
foo....ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr
0.00 csys = 0.10 CPU)
Result: PASS
$ /usr/local/bin/perl -MTest::More -le 'print $Test::More::VERSION'
0.86
5.8.8 is the default system Perl in both Darwin and Linux, 5.10.0 was
installed manually by me. Can anyone please shed some light on this?
Cheers,
Pedro
Thread Next