On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote: >>> I personally use no_plan only because I can't be bothered to >>> manually count things and don't want to assume that the number of >>> tests run on *my* computer is somehow a universal constant. >> >> I'm glad you find no_plan useful. Many others do as well. > > Perhaps I'm being unclear. I do not find either 'no_plan' or 'plan' > to > be useful in their current state. Yes, but many others do. -- Andy Lester => andy@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance