Front page | perl.qa |
Postings from November 2007
On 30 Nov 2007, at 00:51, chromatic wrote: >> $ prove -rb :: gargoyle :: --state=hot,save,all :: splendour :: t/ >> spog.t > > Y'know, at some point I think I'll just write my own wrapper around > TAP::Harness, with attractive members of the appropriate gender, and > blackjack, and an amusement park. > > That is, there *may* be a point here where cramming too much into > prove is > getting confusing. At some point, we all have to write some Perl. The state stuff is useful I think. Passing args to tests is more marginal and I certainly don't believe it's a big enough deal to warrant the amount of debate it's attracted. I'm going to go with '::'. If anyone dislikes it enough, as you say, they can write their own tool. -- Andy Armstrong, HextenThread Previous | Thread Next