Front page | perl.qa |
Postings from January 2007
Re: Test::Harness 3.0
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Andy Armstrong
Date:
January 21, 2007 05:46
Subject:
Re: Test::Harness 3.0
Message ID:
F9C68C64-A6AA-4DD9-8D14-B4A3E3A90ED7@hexten.net
On 21 Jan 2007, at 13:36, demerphq wrote:
> I dont get this logic.
>
> Why cant something that wants to monitor the test process do something
> other than make test?
>
> They can do a make, and or make test-prep or whatever, and then call
> into an alternative test harness framework to monitor the tests.
>
> Can you explain why this is a no-go in more detail?
I'm sure that's possible but I like the simplicity of Adam's proposal
to just dump raw TAP into a file and then feed it back into
TAPx::Parser for subsequent analysis. Is there anything wrong with
that picture?
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next