Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links?

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:33:01AM +0100, 'Patrice Dumas' wrote:
> My personal opinion (and it shouldn't be really surprising, since I 
> also wrote a mail proposing a new command for anchors...) is that 
> index entries and anchors are different, serve a different editing 
> purpose and should be specified with different commands.

I agree; index entries and anchor targets should be different commands.

Ronald

• pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Patrice Dumas
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Ronald J Kimball
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by 'Patrice Dumas'
• AW: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Marek Rouchal
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by 'Patrice Dumas'
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Ronald J Kimball
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Sean M. Burke
• AW: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Marek Rouchal
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by 'Patrice Dumas'
• AW: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Marek Rouchal
• Re: AW: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Shawn H Corey
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Ricardo Signes
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Marc Green
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Patrice Dumas
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Russ Allbery
• Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Karl Williamson
• AW: pod checker that finds missing internal links? by Marek Rouchal