Richard Hainsworth wrote: > Moreover, a survey should be testing perceptions, even if the > perceptions contradict what some feel are facts. It sometimes pays to be > agnostic about what can be counted as a fact to learn how other people > think. Eg., in the real world there are those who perceive as fact the > timeline of the history of life as set out in the Old Testament of the > Bible, and there are those that look to other mechanisms for testing > timeline theories, such as a the geological record. Dont want to start a > religious war, just wanting to indicate that a survey can be useful if > worded in a value-free manner. There are also those who perceive as fact that the biblical and geological timelines are not mutually exclusive and are both plausible. -- Darren DuncanThread Previous | Thread Next