develooper Front page | perl.perl6.users | Postings from February 2008

Re: Perl 6 fundraising and related topics.

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Fagyal Csongor
Date:
February 21, 2008 07:48
Subject:
Re: Perl 6 fundraising and related topics.
Message ID:
47BD9C35.3060502@conceptonline.hu
[...]

>>I was there at the workshop too. You cannot count me in into being biased
>>against Perl 6. Only biased that it takes so long :-).
>>    
>>
>
>I know, and there were some others (like Herbert aka lichtkind, who writes
>and maintains the German Perl 6 wiki pages) with the same opinions.
>
>But the general atmosphere there was rather anti Perl 6, and the recent
>discussions on the wsinfo mailing lists show that all too clearly.
>  
>
It's really not a surprise. Perl5 is not "broken": IMHO many Perl5 programmers just wanted some "little" (erm...) things like a less hacky OO implementation, better function parameters and types, things like that. Perl6 promised these and much-much more, so people were happy. There were news, ideas, Parrot hacking, etc... and people got bored. Basically nothing happend for *years*. That is: many things happened, there is a nice specification now, brilliant features, etc., you all know - but for Average Perl Joe, there is just nothing there. Average Perl Joe needs this:

perl6 hello_world.pl

That's why I am rooting for rakudo: there is progress, or so I figure, and I can "ln -s rakudo perl6" anytime :) Once you can point people to some targzipped source or an RPM or something like that, and 10 minutes later they can indeed write the above line, they will not be anti-Perl6 anymore. (I mean if they will be anti-Perl6 after that, then we can just close this list and everyone can just go home.)

- Fagzal


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About