develooper Front page | perl.perl6.meta | Postings from February 2001

Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
February 22, 2001 13:11
Subject:
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Message ID:
20010222211103.A21646@pembro26.pmb.ox.ac.uk
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:39:25PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> The current RFCs need work.

Be assured that they're getting lots of top-quality work.

> There are new RFCs that could be written. Its totally counter-productive to

... ship a specification to a designer, and then keep adding more and more new
requests to change it. Don't you just *hate* that when people change the
specifications while you're half way through writing a project? Don't do it to
Perl's design.

-- 
COBOL is for morons.
		-- E.W. Dijkstra
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About