Front page | perl.perl6.meta |
Postings from October 2000
At 07:39 PM 10/18/00 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 02:37:16PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg00517.html
>
>No, and no, and no.
Of course not. That'd make perl look like Intercal, which would be silly.
Since it's going to be our implementation language, there wouldn't be much
point in writing perl code, now would there? :-P
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next