Front page | perl.perl6.meta |
Postings from October 2000
Bradley M. Kuhn writes: > It seems to me that the perl6-internals, perl6-qa, and perl6-licenses groups > should be able to produce additional RFCs after this. Of course, the > Language will be frozen, but these three groups may need to remain fluid > after the 14 October 2000 annoucement. I think perl6-licenses should start to move towards a decision after the 14th. Find something that there's a rough consensus for, write up the pro-s and con-s, then give it to Larry. I think -qa should continue. I don't know about RFCs, though. I think we'll need some way to separate the brainstorming RFCs on language from the methodology RFCs on -qa. I see QA having a strong say in how we develop the software: reviews, test cases, and so on. I'm still thinking about how best to encode the -qa group's output. I have no objection to -internals remaining. I think their discussion will probably take off more after Larry's announcement. NatThread Previous | Thread Next