develooper Front page | perl.perl6.licenses | Postings from January 2001

Re: licensing issues

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Russ Allbery
Date:
January 16, 2001 01:10
Subject:
Re: licensing issues
Message ID:
yl7l3vg8wm.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu
Bradley M Kuhn <bkuhn@ebb.org> writes:

> I don't know if the Preamble I wrote if perfect, because I got very
> little feedback on it, and all the RFCs this group submitted.  Those
> last two weeks before RFC's were due, the traffic on this list was
> basically dead, except for me posting revisions of RFCs.  I hope that I
> properly caught the spirit of the consensus properly, but without
> feedback, that was a hard job.

Yeah, and I apologize for my part of that.  I tend to end up with very
bursty periods of time to spend thinking about particular things, and they
often don't line up with schedules very well.

I think you did quite a good job; I expect the issue to come back up again
when Larry's had a chance to look over the proposals and we'll have a few
more chances to clarify and talk it through.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About