develooper Front page | perl.perl6.licenses | Postings from January 2001

Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Chris Nandor
Date:
January 14, 2001 14:41
Subject:
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Message ID:
p0501040cb687db9cb8cb@[10.0.1.177]
At 15.32 -0700 01.14.2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Chris Nandor writes:
>> >(Indeed, it is quite unfortunate that there are so many modules on CPAN
>> >that have chosen Artistic-only or GPL-only.)
>>
>> I think it is unfortunate that anyone would think someone else's choice of
>> license is unfortunate.  :)
>
>I can't even remember the topic we're supposed to be discussing, but
>I'm pretty sure that this would begin a tangent :-)
>
>Brad, are we trying to come to a conclusion or is this just babble?

Seeing as how the RFC process is done, I don't think there is a conclusion
to be had in this forum, at this point.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      pudge@pobox.com    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    pudge@osdn.com     http://osdn.com/
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About