Not really a versioned dependencies. When a working module is updated to have new functionality, the old version continues to work. Here it is the very language that is changing. For instance, =$fh was used to generate input from a file. Now it is $fh.lines Old examples that I wrote using =$fh have to be changed. But there are parts of the language that have stablized, such as regexen, if/given/take statements. There are others that still havent been written, such as sets and the specs on concurrency. Suppose you have a solution that would be neat using sets. If you are scratching an itch, use sets. But if you want something even semi-permanent, avoid sets. In other words, I am suggesting a sort of mapping of the syntax of perl6 so that stable areas can us be used, perhaps avoiding instruments that are not yet explicitly stable. Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Em Sáb, 2010-03-20 às 12:16 +0300, Richard Hainsworth escreveu: > >> Suppose we define a domain of stability as syntax/functionality/features >> that will not be changed until a milestone is reached, with the >> guarantee that if the language specification changes before then, >> backwards compatibility will be retained so that the >> syntax/feature/functionality will continue to function without a need to >> change it or the surrounding code. >> > > I think this is more a case for versioned dependencies. > > I'm not sure this is written down anywhere in the spec, but I guess > there should be a way to tell "this code was written targetting version > $x of the implementation $y" - if the code is compiled to bytecode that > is really easy. > > Then the implementation might have a way to adapt itself to provide the > intended semantics. > > Of course this requires an entire different set of maintainance > challenges, including a very precise delta documentation and probably a > lot of coercion functions, i.e: coerce from Int version 0.003 to Int > 0.004 back and forth. > > That way we have both the grammar, the CORE and the setting being > versioned, and it will be easier to adapt for the future... > > daniel > >Thread Previous | Thread Next