Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from May 2008
Sex, 2008-05-02 às 18:55 +0200, TSa escreveu: > For me, too. But note that we should keep does the ultimate > type checker that first checks the declared presence of a role, > then falls back to a declared class inheritance and then falls > back to a declared emulation. What else should be in this check > sequence? You're taking it backwards, it's not the type checker that is aware of that, but each object's metamodel. The metamodel protocol is just the "do you 'Dog'?" thing. danielThread Previous | Thread Next