HaloO, Ovid wrote: > However, the CGI/CGI::Simple example I posted earlier doesn't fulfill > this. CGI::Simple offers a subset of CGI.pm's functionality and it's > guaranteed to be identical Then, since classes are open, the programmer can easily say CGI does CGI::Simple; and let go CGI instances wherever a CGI::Simple is expected. As added value you can get a compiler check with CGI does:strict CGI::Simple; Regards, TSa. -- "The unavoidable price of reliability is simplicity" -- C.A.R. Hoare "Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Jay Perlis 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... = -1/12 -- Srinivasa RamanujanThread Previous | Thread Next