develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from May 2008

Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
mark.a.biggar
Date:
May 1, 2008 08:53
Subject:
Re: First look: Advanced Polymorphism whitepaper
Message ID:
050120081553.21883.4819E778000244CD0000557B22070029539D0E0909070DD20ED2059D0E03@comcast.net

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "John M. Dlugosz" <dhcgnd702@sneakemail.com>
> Jon Lang dataweaver-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
> > <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> wrote:
> >   
> >>  On May 1, 2008, at 0:53 , chromatic wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>     
> >>> correctness sense.  Sadly, both trees and dogs bark.)
> >>>
> >>>       
> >>  Hm, no.  One's a noun, the other's a verb.  Given the linguistic
> >> orientation of Perl6, it seems a bit strange that the syntax for both is the
> >> same:  while accessors and mutators are *implemented* as verbs, they should
> >> *look* like nouns.
> >>     
> >
> > In defense of chromatic's point, both people and syrup run.
> >
> >   
> Sometimes you don't even know the correct part of speech without a 
> backtracking parser or infinite lookahead in English.
> 
> "The green can
> 
>     (continues...)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> be watered after it has been cut."

And sometime you can't even do it syntactically:

"Time flies like an arrow."
"Fruit flies like a banana."
--
Mark Biggar
mark@biggar.org
mark.a.biggar@comcast.net
mbiggar@paypal.com

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About