jerry gay wrote: > Jonathan Lang wrote: > > I'm not used to programming styles where a programmer intentionally > > and explicitly forbids the use of otherwise perfectly legal code. Is > > there really a market for this sort of thing? > > use strict; Hmm... granted. But that does tend to sidestep the main thrust of my question. The examples I gave involved specific roles or routines being forbidden from use in certain situations; my gut instinct is that if you don't think that it's appropriate to use a particular role or routine somewhere, you should simply not use it there; I can't see why you'd want the compiler or runtime to enforce not using it there. -- Jonathan "Dataweaver" LangThread Previous | Thread Next