Re: +$arg changed to :$arg

On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:06:25AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
: Larry~
: 
: On 10/26/05, Larry Wall <larry@wall.org> wrote:
: > So we'd get:
: >
: >     :@array[42] 42 => @array[1]
: 
: Do you mean C< :@array[42] 42 => @array[42] >?

Yes.  I was changing it because 42 : 1 :: foo : a, but I flubbed.

: > The last three forms are more arguable than the first three, especially
: > since they probably aren't valid formal parameters.  We kind of need
: > a subscript modifier instead:
: >
: >     @array:[42] 42 => @array[1]
: 
: Same question.

Same answer.

Larry

• +$arg changed to :$arg by Larry Wall
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by John Siracusa
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Matt Fowles
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Larry Wall
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Juerd
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Larry Wall
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Larry Wall
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Juerd
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Larry Wall
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by TSa
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Larry Wall
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by TSa
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Rob Kinyon
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by Juerd
• Re: +$arg changed to :$arg by TSa