Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from May 2005
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Juerd
Date:
May 27, 2005 07:41
Subject:
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
Message ID:
20050527144143.GW31996@c4.convolution.nl
"TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)" skribis 2005-05-27 16:22 (+0200):
> This argumentation breaks down as soon as you regard &infix:{'='} as
> an operator like many others.
Which we don't, making this discussion much easier for everyone.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
-
(1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Autrijus Tang
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Austin Hastings
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Luke Palmer
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Autrijus Tang
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Larry Wall
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Juerd
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by TSa
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Juerd
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by TSa
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Juerd
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by TSa
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Mark Reed
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Juerd
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by TSa
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Juerd
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by TSa
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Rod Adams
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Markus Laire
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Rod Adams
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Juerd
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by TSa
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by TSa
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Juerd
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Rod Adams
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Matt Fowles
-
Re: (1,(2,3),4)[2]
by Autrijus Tang