Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from May 2005
Re: foo(1: 2: 3: 4:) ?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Damian Conway
Date:
May 22, 2005 21:45
Subject:
Re: foo(1: 2: 3: 4:) ?
Message ID:
42915FA8.8060702@conway.org
Autrijus Tang wrote:
> In that case:
>
> $w.handle_event($e: $m);
>
> should be illegal as well, right?
Right.
> That is, the App (functional application) form always zero or one
> invocants, and it is illegal to specify more than one.
Right.
Damian
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next