Ingo Blechschmidt wrote: > I meant: The colon should still act as the delimiter between the params > which account to the long name of the role and those which don't, but > otherwise the syntax should be the same as the standard subroutine > signature syntax, allowing optional params, etc. I don't think that a role has a long and a short name. This is because they aren't subject to MMD. I think of them more as beeing expanded like C++ templates even though the actual mechanism will be much more sophisticated. Actually I think of them as F-bounds as well ;) > s/T/::Type/? Ohh, sorry. Yes, or the other way round. Should be consistent. -- TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)Thread Previous | Thread Next